Skip to main content

Is this a CSS Bug: setting Background and z-index for Pseudo selectors(::before & :: after)

Recently I was making some UI for a friend's project. We had this CSS button effect that works elsewhere but failed to work at the desired location. Upon troubleshooting, we discovered that if the parent element has a background defined, you can't control the z-index of the pseudo selection of any of its children. Wait for it, I have got some demo.




TL;DR

set background colour or image for a "DIV.parent", create a "Div.child" inside the "DIV.parent". use CSS to modify the "::before"" element of the "Div.child" as follows; set position as absolute, content as an empty string, height:100% and width is best at 50% for example purposes, lastly, give it a background colour.
You will observe that the "::before"" element is overlaying the actual element's content. Try to adjust the z-index of the "::before"". You will also realize that the z-index works fine if we remove the background setting for "DIV.parent".



Let's run through some code.

we begin with our markup then we move to CSS styles.

Our goal is to have a DIV where the background colour is defined on the pseudo-element(::before). For this to happen, we must make the DIV's position relative, then we set an absolute position for the pseudo-element. The pseudo-element also needs to be 100% height and any width greater than zero is fine. The absolute position here will force our pseudo-element to overlay the text. This is why we need to set a "z-index". The issue now is that the z-index is not giving desired effects. This was traced to the fact that the "parent" container had a background property defined.

<body>

    <div class="parent">
        <h1 style="color: white;">One BG disturbs another</h1>
        
        <div class="child">
            Where is my ::before's BG
        </div>

        <div class="child reset-z-index">
            I'm here without Z-index
        </div>
    </div>

    <div class="child">
        BG is out the BOX
    </div>
    
</body>

Now to the CSS styles

        .parent{
            background#8ba274;
        }

        .child{
            padding15px;
            displayinline-block;
            bordersolid 1px rebeccapurple;
            positionrelative;
            margin-top15px;
            margin-bottom15px;
            color#19634a;
            font-weightbolder;
        }

        .child::before{
            positionabsolute;
            top0;
            left0;
            content'';
            width100px;
            height100%;
            background-color#f11;
            z-index-1;
        }

        .reset-z-index::before{
            z-indexauto;
        }

Here in the style, we set the z-index as auto, to ensure that we can see what happens when the z-index is not set.


I am not sure what can be called a bug. I have only tried this on chrome browser (Version 92.0.4515.107 (Official Build) (64-bit)) so feel free to engage and let's see what happens at your own end when you test on all browsers. Perhaps you could find a better reason why this has to be so.

Cheers.

The resolution: if you have to use the pseudo-element for a similar function, ensure the parent container has no background property defined. Or better still, set your background property on the body tag.

Plot Twist: If you add background colour to the ".child" style, it becomes more messy and unusable.

This however has been solved and I am making a new article on how we got it solved.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Articles

[SOLVED] Linux - Issues installing Docker on Ubuntu - libseccomp2 version 2.3.1 installed but 2.4 required

This article has been improved for a better understanding - goto  https://splashcoder.blogspot.com/2023/07/installing-docker-on-ubuntu-1804-solved.html There is a possibility that you are trying to install docker. There is a very comprehensive guide at https://docs.docker.com/engine/install/ubuntu/#install-using-the-repository. The linked guide serves as a reference for this article. We try to address the common errors in this article. Just so you won’t have to scour the entire answers on StackOverflow. Step 1: The first thing is to run our famous "apt update" command. So run the command below. sudo apt-get update You may observe that there are some errors. And YES! we are using a fairly old Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic Beaver Release. It seems perfect for this as most people have issues installing docker anyways. To resolve this, you may refer to  Configure DNS server IP to resolve errors with apt-get update Step 2: Following the Docker article, we should run the commands below. sudo...

Resolving Incompatible Builds of PHP and Apache in Laragon: Add multiple versions of Apache

 As developers, it's often the case that different versions of PHP and server tools are installed quickly without taking into account the architecture for which they were built. In this article, we will focus on solving a specific error that arises when running incompatible builds of PHP and Apache. Recently, I encountered an issue when downgrading my Laragon setup from PHP 8.1 (x64) to PHP 7.x (x86). This caused compatibility problems with Apache, and I received an error message indicating that my PHP and Apache builds were not compatible, as the Apache installed was built for x64 versions of PHP. In this article, I'll provide a step-by-step guide on how to install multiple versions of Apache on Laragon. By following these steps, you can resolve any similar issues that you may encounter. Step 1: Download the Latest Version of Apache Visit https://www.apachelounge.com/download/additional/ to download the latest version of Apache. The homepage provides quick access to 64-bit ve...

Chrome Extension (part 1): Injecting External Scripts into a Web Page

Recently, I was required to develop a chrome extension for some executives. This plugin only targeted a few of our most visited websites. There was a lot of approaches to implement the extension and all our use cases. One particular challenge was trying to inject scripts from our own CDN into specific web pages. the scripts were required to interact with the page and all variables possible. Since there is a script isolation thing for Chrome Extensions, I felt this was a good challenge to take up in my spare time. Here is a sample of my content script. content.js document.onreadystatechange = function () { console.log("document state is:" + document.readyState); if (document.readyState == "complete") { let randAntiCache = Math.random().toString().split('.')[1]; let scriptURL4="http://localhost.test/testscript.js?v="+randAntiCache; let scriptnode4 = document.createElement("script"); scriptnode4.setAttribute("s...